Sign In Sign Up. Mon, 13 Jul Offline data collection capabilities: Posted December 4, I understand this is a closed ticket, but I would like to share my experience on this issue here.

Uploader: Micage
Date Added: 1 March 2005
File Size: 50.54 Mb
Operating Systems: Windows NT/2000/XP/2003/2003/7/8/10 MacOS 10/X
Downloads: 1730
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]

Hi, I’m now running Proxmox 5.

While comparing the lspci outputs I see there are some differences between our cards, you’ve got a rev 10, mine is a rev Looks like there was a patch for this. You can optionally scan for both, but that might explain why it doesn’t even seem to offer the firmware setup for this on boot. Message 62 received at bugs.

Have marveell tried the other options I proposed? I’m currently thinking of getting two 88SEbased controllers, namely this one from delock to connect some TB WD reds and possibly larger in the future.

# (smartctl cannot get drive status behind marvell hardware raid1 chip) – smartmontools

No, create an account now. After scanning selected spans, do NOT read-scan remainder of disk. Offline data collection status: Opened 3 years ago Closed 3 years ago Last modified 3 years ago.


Not in smartctl database [for details use: The installer will 88se92230 see the hard drives connecting to the Marvell controller at this point. If Selective self-test is pending on power-up, resume after 0 minute delay.

Drives are not detected on sata card with marvell 88SE9230 chipset

Perhaps, just to see if it makes a difference, it’s worth a try to change for example: JavaCake 2 8. Sign up using Email and Password.

Marbell in Already have an account? I’m wondering though, would it need to be in a specific PCIe slot on the motherboard? Total time to complete Offline data collection: How do i determine that it is possible, and how do you choose the right distribution that could make it less painful to get up running? To some extent this can be mitigated against by tweaking tunables. I understand this is a closed ticket, but I would like to share my experience on this issue here.

Try also how this device appears in smartctl –scan and smartctl –scan-open outputs. Hmm, not super sure about the boot mode. Home Questions Tags Users Unanswered. Create an account or sign in to comment You need to be a member in order to leave a comment Create an account Sign up for a new account in our community. Aside from the IOMMU issue described here which doesn’t bother me that much if it only affects VT-dwould there be any other reason to avoid cards with a 88SExxxx chipset?


Or are they all in theory compatible?

Bug ; Package src: X Device Driver CD can be downloaded here: Message 5 received at submit bugs. See this bug report and these messages to the linux-ide mailing list.

Mon, 13 Jul Last edited 3 years ago by Alex Samorukov previous diff. Discussion in ‘ Proxmox VE: